RESUMEN
The COVID-19 pandemic has raised ethical questions for the cardiovascular leader and practitioner. Attention has been redirected from a system that focuses on individual patient benefit toward one that focuses on protecting society as a whole. Challenging resource allocation questions highlight the need for a clearly articulated ethics framework that integrates principled decision making into how different cardiovascular care services are prioritized. A practical application of the principles of harm minimisation, fairness, proportionality, respect, reciprocity, flexibility, and procedural justice is provided, and a model for prioritisation of the restoration of cardiovascular services is outlined. The prioritisation model may be used to determine how and when cardiovascular services should be continued or restored. There should be a focus on an iterative and responsive approach to broader health care system needs, such as other disease groups and local outbreaks.
Asunto(s)
Servicio de Cardiología en Hospital , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Infecciones por Coronavirus , Ética Institucional , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Pandemias , Manejo de Atención al Paciente , Neumonía Viral , Betacoronavirus/aislamiento & purificación , COVID-19 , Canadá/epidemiología , Servicio de Cardiología en Hospital/organización & administración , Servicio de Cardiología en Hospital/tendencias , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/terapia , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Humanos , Modelos Organizacionales , Innovación Organizacional , Pandemias/prevención & control , Manejo de Atención al Paciente/ética , Manejo de Atención al Paciente/métodos , Manejo de Atención al Paciente/normas , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
Cardiac rehabilitation programs across Canada have suspended in-person services as a result of large-scale physical distancing recommendations designed to flatten the COVID-19 pandemic curve. Virtual cardiac rehabilitation (VCR) offers an alternate mechanism of care delivery, capable of providing similar patient outcomes and safety profiles compared with centre-based programs. To minimize care gaps, all centres should consider developing and implementing a VCR program. The process of this rapid implementation, however, can be daunting. Centres should initially focus on the collation, utilization, and repurposing of existing resources, equipment, and technology. Once established, programs should then focus on ensuring that quality indicators are met and care processes are protocolized. This should be followed by the development of sustainable VCR solutions to account for care gaps that existed before COVID-19, and to improve cardiac rehabilitation delivery, moving forward. This article reviews the potential challenges and obstacles of this process and aims to provide pragmatic guidance to aid clinicians and administrators during this challenging time.